It’s a quote from Dune, I highly recommend reading the books or watching the films. Fear is the name of the game in politics anymore. See that guy over there, he’s going to take away something valuable to you, and the only way to protect it is to vote for me. It’s played by both sides of the aisle, and the application of fear in campaigns is well know, well documents, and flat-out nonsensical at times.
Why do I bring this up? Fear goes both ways. We’re afraid of the pending failure of our government to be able to pay its bills, so the President and the dutiful denizens of the left in congress roll out additional taxes and new spending to engage the economy in what could be the most over-estimated recovery that has yet to happen.
Meanwhile there is the argument from the President that the Deficit is going down (as a side now, each projected pseudo-budget that has been touted out for the last five years has been a ‘deficit-reducing’ budget) and yet we’ve tacked on $6 trillion to the national debt. So, there’s our fear. We’re deep in the hole and we need money. So, how do we get this money. We limit how much goes into Roth IRA’s. It’s a short story put up by The Hill pointing out that the super wealthy have been squirreling away money in Roth IRAs, which they can’t touch until they’re 59 and a half without some heavy penalties, and in a desperate attempt to raise some additional coin, the government thinks that the amount of dough saved in those accounts shouldn’t exceed a specified amount.
I understand the logic. There’s money there, and, after pouring through more pages of the IRS website than I care to do ever again, it turns out you pay an excise tax of 6% on excessive donations, and early withdrawals are taxed at rate, and then 10% more on top (again if withdrawn before you are 59 and a half). So, in all that, there’s money. How much money? I’m not certain the numbers are solid, but according to the article from The Hill roughly $9 billion over the next decade. Yup, over the next decade they’d square away 0.005% of last year’s deficit.
Solid plan there.
Nominally, it’s going to take work, and I hope to god they’re working on it because right now I don’t think it’d pay for the paper it’s being printed on.
The other side of the sword is the delivery method. Like I said, we’re talking about fear here, and the need to make people afraid. Why are we talking about this? Because it’s scary. Because the Government is going after our retirement savings, or so the Drudge Report would have you believe.
If you hit the Drudge Report over the weekend you would have seen the hyperlink to “Obama budget targets retirement accounts…”. Rolling off the recent move by the EU to soak the owners of money laden accounts in the national bank of Cyprus, there is an expectation of the government in the United States doing something similar to ward off a fiscal boogeyman (don’t get me wrong, we have serious money problems) but to snag 40-60% of the value of all accounts that hold more than $100,000…can’t happen, won’t happen, and will break the financial system faster than the housing bubble of 2008.
Now, rank and file readers aren’t expecting this. Most folks are pretty certain that their money is safe, and it is. The Cyprus situation was a state run and controlled bank, we don’t have that in the US. We have a fed that feeds into banks, but those accounts are ours, and the money comes out of the hides of the bank, not out of Uncle Sam. However, it’s still a scary thought. It’s in red, of all colors, against all the black text. It’s important. It’s also inaccurate based on the text of the article linked. Not wholly inaccurate, but omits the focus on the wealthy aspect of the donors being targeted.
So, boogeymen abound on both sides, and what do we have. People worried that their retirement funds are now the target of a government siege on savings to slake their ever-growing thirst for funds to toss at social projects, and politicians who are offering weak tea solutions to monumental budgetary issues. This is not a good-get. This isn’t even a good story. It’s about as bottom of the barrel as you can get when it comes to dialogue. There is no genuine interest in doing what is right, just in making sure that someone is scare, and what they are hoping is that someone is you.