It is not enough to do good; one must do it the right way.
John Viscount Morley, of Blackburn
So, I’ve been gone for a bit. School, as it turns out, is a little more arduous than expected this semester. Planning is now coming together, and I should have my acts in order now. Apologies to those who have read what little I’ve written and found interest. My intention was never to leave you wanting, or to wander off into the dark expanses of the internet to never be seen again. In a shorter phrase, “shit happened”. Now, on to more pressing/interesting matters.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/189844/did_a_school_use_webcams_to_spy_on_students_at_home.html
So, the remote desktop feature, something available on pretty much every Mac computer and, in several unique cases, was used to locate missing or stolen hardware, was apparently used to observe a student in his home. The laptops are school issued, but, according to ever report I’ve seen on the matter, there is nothing in the contract the parents and students sign regarding off-campus observation.
So, now we have a young man who was approached by an Assistant Principal on a matter in which he was apparently doing something she did not approve of. This would venture two questions:1) how long were they observing him doing whatever it is they are displeased with, and 2) were they informed that he was doing something illicit or did they just magically turn the webcam on to find him in a compromising position or role?
The second is statistically improbable, and the first implies a hideous revelation about how long those who have been abusing this technology have been at the game. I believe the parents concerns are warranted regarding the possibility of students being observed in compromising positions or possibly, as one article put it, in “states of undress”. Now the FBI is investigating and there are records of 42 remote access actions to recover 28 missing laptops. The number of unrecorded webcam activations could be in the low hundreds.
To be frank, a question needs must raised about the intellectual capacity of the Principal and Superintendent on the matter. As the invasive capacity of technology grows, the inclusion of technology into the educational environment must come at the pace of educating those who will be responsible for said technology. The remote desktop feature could have been modified to exclude the webcam, as well as not relying on the webcam at all. Rather, utilization the webcam as an anti-theft and item recover device work on the principles that the laptop is online, and that the offending individual hasn’t left it in a bag or similar carrying case.
No, software like Lo-Jack, designed specifically for the purpose of locating stolen equipment, was not used to my knowledge. Furthermore, Lo-Jack only sends out communication signals daily unless the school reports the item stolen, then every 15 minute updates are issued until the laptop is recovered. The use of the webcam as a device by which they ‘locate’ goods is a half-ass excuse at best since most stolen laptops, I imagine, are going to be closed off, and possibly active. Lo-Jack will tell you where a laptop is if it is connected to the internet. A webcam on a shut laptop will give you a black screen that tells you jack all about your position.
The simple fact that they managed to recover 28 of 42 reported missing laptops speaks to the level of responsibility and due diligence of a student to not forget their laptop at home rather than to track a thief.
Lastly, while the school feels it is necessary to ‘track down’ thieves that might try to lift their property, it is not their job to hunt down thieves and brigands. A computer goes missing, a report to the police is generated, and then, and only then, is the webcam activated to locate the equipment. Anyone operating outside the realms of their job as an information technician or as an administrator of an educational facility should be sacked on the spot. Leave the law enforcement to those who wear the badges.
Old Jeffersonian 